What dynamic lift factor should I apply to this load to account for the uncertain dynamic effects I have refered to the Crane design code for my region and have found load factors to vary between 1.1 to 2.2, depending on the fundamental frequency of the cage and the lift velocity.My previous company used a 1.35 dynamic lift factor based on this code whilst my current employer uses a 1.5 factor but seems that no-one has ever questioned the use of this factor.I am interested to hear how others have handled this problem It is your responsibility to assure that the slings you use are appropriate for your application.Factors you must consider include: Type of hitchmethod of rigging; Effect of angle on capacity; Chemical environment compatibility; Protection from load edges; Temperature of load and lift environment; Condition of sling - passes all inspection criteria.
Specificindirecteffects Plugin Estimands Amos 23 Downlloads Code For MySpecificindirecteffects Plugin Estimands Amos 23 Downlloads Upgrade Your BrowserTo browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. They explain why (a story about the process) an effect of X on Y occurs. Questions (228) Publications (596,220) Questions related to Negotiation 1 2 3 Daniel H. Spitz asked a question related to Negotiation How to interpret mediation model with significant indirect effect and insignificant direct effect Question 1 answer Feb 23, 2021 Hello, Ive tried to analysis a mediation effect and found that X predicted M and M predicted Y, but X had no direct effect on Y. Also, Ive found that X has a rather strong significant indirect effect on Y through M. Should I report it as a mediation model If so, how Best, Daniel Mediation models.spv 954.03 KB Relevant answer Paul F Burke Feb 24, 2021 Answer Well that sounds like total mediation where the mediating effect is significant, whilst the direct effect is now insignificant. Theoretically Ill leave that up to you as we dont know what the constructs are such that the mediating effect explains the significance of X on Y. View 0 Recommendations Mahmoud Maqableh asked a question related to Negotiation What it does mean that no overlapping zero in-between the values for mediation Question 1 answer Feb 20, 2021 With Beta 0.213, 95 Boot CI: LL 0.252, UL 0.474, as the trend does not overlapping zero in-between the values that specify for mediation. What does it mean no overlapping zero in-between the values for mediation. The confidence interval gives you a range of values taking into account or reflecting how much error you have I this estimate. So if the confidence interval contains the zero you cannot reject the hypothesis that it the population parameter is equal to zero. Remember your parameter estimate is simply a mean not the actual population parameter which is unobservable View 0 Recommendations Yufei Huang asked a question related to Negotiation The role of total effects for mediation analysis Question 3 answers Feb 19, 2021 Hello guys I am following Zhao et al. ![]() According to their descriptions, when indirect effect ( a b ) is significant but direct effect ( c ) is nonsignificant, it represents a full mediation. Do I still need to calculate total effect ( a b c ) for their approach In the smartPLS results, the total effect ( a b c ) showed nonsignificant. Can I still conclude a full mediation in this situation ZHAO, X. S., LYNCH, J. G. CHEN, Q. M. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Specificindirecteffects Plugin Estimands Amos 23 Downlloads How To Interpret TheRelevant answer Yufei Huang Feb 20, 2021 Answer Imran Anwar Holger Steinmetz Thank you so much for your contributions View 0 Recommendations Sweta.r asked a question related to Negotiation What is the step by step process involved in interpreting the results of mediation analysis done using PROCESS macro Question 3 answers Feb 10, 2021 Namely, I am wondering how to interpret the following: The results show that path a, c and c is significant. Another set of results show that path a and c are significant but path b and c are not significant. So, what does this now mean Is there a mediation going on or not For more clarity please find the results document that I have attached. Essentially this is the indirect effect which if signif you have mediation - total if direct is insignif and partial if it remains significant). In this case a times a small number will produce a small number.but that needs to be ratioed against the error in those two effects a and b. Hope that helps View 0 Recommendations Marta Riquelme Medina asked a question related to Negotiation To test the relationship between X and Y in a mediation analysis, would you consider the total effect, the direct effect or both Question 1 answer Feb 18, 2021 Hi, I have a question with regards to full mediation. Lets say that I stablished one hypothesis that says: X positively influences Y, and then I analyse other variables (M) to assess whether there is a mediation effect between that relationship: X and Y. ![]() Then, it is the significant indirect effect of M what explains that relationship between X and Y (if I am not wrong). How would you explain the first hypothesis (i.e., X positively influences Y) a) It is supported because the total effect is significant. Thank you so much in advance Relevant answer Paul F Burke Feb 18, 2021 Answer It is supported but the effect can be explained by the mediator.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |